




Figures 1 – 6
Figures 7 – 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figures 17 – 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Introduction
The WHR Architects rebrand has been one of the most challenging and yet, rewarding projects I have ever had the privilege of being a part of. By definition, architects are well-rounded in many aspects of design. They exceed at three dimensional form, color, texture, materials, structure, objects, scale and the relationship and human response to these characteristics of design. They even employ a process called “Evidence-Based Design” by which data collected from the user experience is utilized to influence their design and decision making processes.
All this is to say that, throughout the branding process, there was an incredible amount of truth involved, i.e. in a design presentation you would never get away with, “I did this because it looks really cool”. No amount of marketing or design speak would ever work either. Every single decision had to have a reason; a reason that directly related to their core values, culture, vision or nature of their business.
The Logotype
The WHR Architects rebranding process began as a symbol exploration. Their previous logo, which consisted of a red (or black) box with WHR (set in Garamond) reversed out in the lower portion, was dated and their colors were not unique in the industry. In fact, red (or variation of red including red-orange), black and gray seems to be the consensus among the local architectural firms.
While I can not be specific as to what the symbol exploration looked like, I can say that throughout the lengthy process more than 250 symbols were explored and presented in a variety of formats. Towards the end, we were left with a few unique ideas in the mix and how they could be applied to a few of the stationery components.
But because WHR saw themselves as a company that was so multi-dimensional, cross-cultural and multi-facted, they could not reconcile themselves to a singular mark or symbol. The end result was a simple, consistent approach taken towards the application of the identity across businesses and markets while the accompanying supergraphic, initially presented as a visual play or extension of one of the symbols, takes on a more predominant role.
See Figures 1 – 6
Guidelines
Concomitant to the design of supporting collateral, brand identity guidelines were also created that outlined specific components of the new brand including core values, positioning, color and application of the logotype and supporting supergraphic(s).
What is interesting about this document, while an excerpt, is that is suggests how the static supergraphic can be expounded on, allowing a virtually unlimited amount of possibilities with the implementation.
See Figures 6 – 7
Stationery
See Figures 9 – 16
Notebooks
See Figures 17 – 18
Brand Box
See Figure 19
T-Shirt
See Figure 20
Website
See Figure 21
Credits
No animals were harmed in the production of this post, but one blue envelope was completely destroyed.
















